Genome Report | Genome Report
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2024; 52(2): 195-199
https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2402.02010
Jiwon Kim1,3, Yong Ju Jin1, Min Ju Lee1, Dong Suk Park2, and Jaekyeong Song1,4*
1Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
2Microbial Safety Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
3Department of Agricultural Biology, College of Agricultural & Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
4Organic Agriculture Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Adminisration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to :
Jaekyeong Song, mgjksong@korea.kr
Paraburkholderia phenoliruptrix T36S-14, identified as a potential plant growth-promoting bacterium, was isolated from the core microbiome of tomato rhizosphere soil. When assessed for its growth promotion, Strain T36S-14 demonstrated a notable 20% increase in the fresh weight of tomato seedlings. The strain possesses two circular chromosomes, one of 4,104,520 base pair (bp) (CP119873) and the other of 3,258,072 bp (CP119874), both exhibiting G+C contents of 63.5% and 62.7%, respectively. The chromosome comprises 6,319 protein-coding sequences, 65 transfer RNA genes, and 18 ribosomal RNA genes (5S: 6, 16S: 6, and 23S: 6). Additionally, P. phenoliruptrix T36S-14 produces siderophores that promote plant growth.
Keywords: Genome, plant growth, Paraburkholderia phenoliruptrix, rhizosphere
Tomatoes, recognized for their high economic value, are a pivotal horticultural crop globally. Conventional fertilizers, although widely used in agriculture, have persistent environmental repercussions, particularly soil and groundwater pollution. As an alternative, plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are becoming promising biofertilizers owing to their eco-friendly environment and enhanced soil fertility. In this study,
The whole genome of T36S-14 was sequenced using the PacBio Sequel II system and the Illumina platform at Macrogen Inc. (Republic of Korea). PacBio reads facilitated the assembly process, and Illumina reads were used for error correction of the genome assembly using Pilon version 1.21. Functional annotation was conducted using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) to comprehensively elucidate the genetic elements and potential functionalities encoded in the genome [1]. Genomic analysis of strain T36S-14 revealed a unique genomic architecture with two circular chromosomes. Chromosome 1 contained 4,104,520 base pairs (bp) with a G-C content of 63.5%, whereas chromosome 2 contained 3,258,072 bp with a G-C content of 62.7%. The contig 1 and contig 2 genomes contained 6,319 predicted coding sequences (CDSs), 65 transfer RNAs (tRNA), and 18 ribosomal RNAs (rRNA; 6 equal for 5S, 16S, 23S). (Table 1). Clusters of Orthologous Group (COG) functional annotation analysis predicted that 6,283 genes, accounting for 97.4% of the total predicted CDS, were distributed across 25 categories (Fig. 1A). OrthoANI values were calculated using the OrthoANI algorithm version v0.93.1 [2] from the available genomes of
Table 1 . Genome features of
Genome features | Chromosome 1 | Chromosome 2 |
---|---|---|
Genome size (bp) | 4,104,520 bp | 3,258,072 bp |
Genome coverage | 100 | |
G + C ratio (%) | 63.% | 62.7% |
Protein-coding genes (CDSs) | 6,319 | |
tRNA genes | 55 | 10 |
rRNA genes (5S, 16S, 23S) | 3, 3, 3 | 3, 3, 3 |
Pseudo genes | 116 | |
Gene bank accession number | CP119873 | CP119874 |
Genomic analysis of
The genome sequences of
This study was carried out with the support of “Research program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No PJ015876)” from the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. This study was supported by 2020-2023 collaborative research program between university and Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Da-Ryung Jung, GyuDae Lee, Tino Bashizi, and Jae-Ho Shin
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(4): 548-550 https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2310.10017Amani Sliti, Min-Ji Kim, GyuDae Lee, Yeong-Jun Park, and Jae-Ho Shin
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(3): 296-299 https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2307.07010Sihyun Park, GyuDae Lee, Ikwhan Kim, Yeongyu Jeong, and Jae-Ho Shin
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(3): 306-308 https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2307.07013