Molecular and Cellular Microbiology (MCM) | Microbial Genetics, Physiology and Metabolism
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(2): 135-146
https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2303.03006
Zain Ul Abedien1, Kainat Gul2*, Sara Khan1, Maheen Shafiq3, Khizar Rahman1, and Muhammad Hassan Nawaz4
1Institute of Microbiology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
2Department of Microbiology, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan
3School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
4Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Pakistan
Correspondence to :
Kainat Gul, kainatgul195@gmail.com
Viral oncology is focused on understanding the relationship between cancer and viruses, which are known to play a role in the development of certain types of cancer. Approximately 15-20% of human cancers are believed to be caused by oncogenic viruses, and as a result, there is significant interest in understanding how these viruses contribute to cancer development. There are several viruses that have been linked to cancer, including human papillomavirus, hepatitis B and C virus, Epstein-Barr virus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, and Merkel cell polyomavirus. Each of these viruses is associated with different types of cancer, and the mechanisms by which they contribute to cancer development are diverse. This article discusses these mechanisms as well as current and future strategies for preventing and treating virus-associated cancers with the goal of presenting a thorough review of the current state of knowledge in viral oncology and to highlight the importance of continued research in this field.
Keywords: Oncogenesis, cancer, virology, HPV, oncoviruses
Viral oncology is a rapidly growing field that is focused on understanding the relationship between viruses and cancer. Worldwide, cancer is the leading cause of death and viruses are known to contribute in the growth of certain types of cancer. Approximately 15−20% of human cancers are believed to be caused by oncogenic viruses [1]. The worldwide impact of cancer caused by infectious agents is on the rise for various reasons, including poor hygiene, and sexual contact during intercourse. The most prevalent cause of cancer is the bacterium
One of the most well-known examples of a virus that can cause cancer is human papillomavirus. A common sexually transmitted pathogen HPV that can cause cervical cancer, as well as other types of cancer such as anal, oropharyngeal, vaginal, and vulvar cancer [4]. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention state, HPV associated cancer are responsible for more than 47,199 cases each year [5]. Other viruses that have been linked to cancer include the hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV), which are linked with liver cancer, and the Epstein-Barr virus, which is linked with certain types of lymphoma [6]. The first oncovirus was discovered in 1964 by M. A. Epstein in a case of Burkitt's lymphoma. Initially, it was noted for its resemblance to the Herpes simplex virus and was later named the Epstein-Bar virus [7].
Recent research has begun to shed light on the mechanisms by which these viruses contribute to cancer development. For example, it is known that certain strains of HPV can integrate into the DNA of host cells, resulting in the suppression of tumor suppressor genes and the stimulation of oncogenes. This can lead to uncontrolled cell growth and the formation of a tumor [8]. Similarly, the into HBV and HCV are known to lead to chronic inflammation and damage to the liver, which can ultimately lead to liver cancer [9, 10].
In terms of prevention and treatment, there are two different strategies to tackle these infections. One of the most promising strategies is the development of vaccines. For example, for preventing HPV infections, the HPV vaccine is very successful, and has been demonstrated to significantly lower the risk of cervical cancer [11, 12]. Similarly, the hepatitis B vaccine can help prevent HBV infections, and thus reduce the risk of liver cancer. Second most promising strategy is the use of anti-viral therapies to target the virus directly, or to target the cancer cells that have been infected with the virus [13]. All of these viruses have unique oncogenes and proteins. These oncogenes can play a part in the growth and progression of tumor [14]. There is total seven viruses that can cause different kinds of cancers [15].
In this article, we will delve deeper into the current state of research in viral oncology and provide an overview of the seven types of viruses as depicted in Fig. 1 that have been linked to cancer, the mechanisms by which these viruses contribute to cancer development, and current and future strategies for preventing and treating viral-associated cancers. We will also discuss the challenges and limitations of this field and what is needed to further our knowledge of the intricate interaction between cancer and viruses. The goal of this article is to provide a thorough and current review of the current state of knowledge in viral oncology and to highlight the importance of continued research in this field.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has identified 11 agents that have been linked to causing cancer. These agents include one bacterium,
From 2012 to 2018, the impact of carcinogenic agents is on rise. The total number of cases in case of HPV in 2012 was 640,000 and it was 690,000 in 2018 [2, 15]. Similar index rate was observed in other carcinogenic agents. Table 1 depicts the cancers caused by viruses along with their oncogenes or proteins.
Table 1 . Tabular depiction of oncoviruses and their associated diseases.
Pathogen | Cancer disease | Oncogene/protein | Vaccine | IARC Classification | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hepatitis B | Hepatocellular carcinoma | Present | 1 | [13, 19] | |
Hepatitis C | Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hepatocellular carcinoma | 186-gene, core, E1, E2, NS3, and NS5A proteins | Nil | 1 | [20, 21] |
KSHV | Kaposi Sarcoma, Primary effusion lymphoma | vFLIP protein | Nil | 1 | [22, 23, 24] |
HTLV-1 | Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) | tax and | Nil | 1 | [25] |
Merkel cell polyomavirus | Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) | small T-antigen [ST], large T-antigen [LT] and ALTO [alternate frame of the large T ORF] and two viral coat proteins, VP1 and VP2 | Nil | 1 | [26] |
Epstein bar virus | Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, gastric carcinoma and nasopharyngeal | HLA-A/B, HLA-region | Nil | 1 | [27] |
HPV [High Risk] | Cervical, anogenital, head and neck carcinoma | E6 and E7 gene | Present | 1 | [28, 29] |
The HBV is a small virus that belongs to the
HBV affects the liver and can cause both acute and chronic diseases affecting more than 350 million people worldwide [35]. The contact with infected bodily fluids is responsible for the spread of virus, such as semen, blood, and vaginal secretion, and can also be transmitted through contaminated practices such as tattooing and body piercing [36]. In some individuals, acute hepatitis B infection can resolve on its own within a few months, but in others it can progress to chronic infection, which can last a lifetime and lead to serious health complications, including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is a type of liver cancer [37, 38].
Studies have shown that chronic infection with hepatitis B increases the risk of developing HCC. This is because the persistent presence of the virus in the liver can lead to chronic inflammation and damage to liver cells, which can eventually lead to the formation of cancerous cells [39]. The risk for HCC is highest in individuals with chronic hepatitis B infection who also have cirrhosis, as the liver damage and scarring associated with cirrhosis can increase the likelihood of cancer development [40]. The estimated HCC death toll is more than 0.5 million per year and considered as the 2nd cause of death due to cancer [41, 42].
On the other hand, HCV is a blood-borne virus that primarily infects liver cells, causing liver inflammation and tissue damage. It is characterized as a member of the
In conclusion, hepatitis B and C are serious viral infections that may be able to cause both acute and chronic diseases, possessing a high potential for liver cancer development in individuals with chronic infections.
HBV and HCV trigger the development of HCC in a context of inflammation and regeneration that originates from long-term liver damage, indicating that the base of HCC is linked to the immune system [47]. The HBV and HCV proteins change the way host genes are expressed and the cellular characteristics, which are hallmark signs of cancer. These modifications cause tissue invasion, angiogenesis, metastasis, growth-factor independent cell division, altered energy metabolism, resistance to growth inhibition, and resistance to cell death despite persistent immune response and treatment [48]. Chronic inflammation also causes genetic instability in tumor cells. HBV contributes to liver cancer by expressing the HBx protein, and HCV's contribution involves the core protein and non-structural proteins NS3 and NS5A. Changes in host gene expression that support tumor growth also seem to support virus replication and protect virus-infected cells from immune damage. The development of liver cancer doesn't appear to benefit the virus and often leads to the death of the host [49].
Virus persistence, the long-term existence of HBV and HCV in infected cells, is crucial in the development of liver cancer. HBV DNA persists as an episome in the form of a minichromosome in cell nuclei, and integration of HBx and truncated S/pre-S sequences into host DNA can lead to tumor growth [50]. HCV, on the other hand, persists as an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated episome without integration. The survival and growth of virus-infected cells favored by the viruses contributes to liver cancer progression such as chronic liver disease (CLD). Co-infections of both viruses in a single patient seem to accelerate the pathogenesis of liver cancer through common mechanisms that cause oxidative stress and production of harmful cytokines. In addition, variations in the virus genome can also impact the replication and interaction of viruses, particularly in patients infected with both HBV and HCV [49]. The progression of HBV and HCV induced cancer is expressed in Fig. 2 [51].
However, the impact of cancer is amplified when a secondary infection with HIV is present in patients already infected with either HBV or HCV. The severity of the disease and its progression to chronicity is affected by various factors, like viral load, the age of infection, and the presence of co-infections with other liver pathogens and conditions [52].
There are ongoing trials to assess the effectiveness of immunotherapy and vaccinations in treating carcinoma caused by HBV and HCV. Despite these efforts, the use of vaccines to prevent HCC remains limited. One potential reason for this low efficacy is that the immune system may develop tolerance to self-antigens (such as TAA), which hinders the development of a strong antitumor immune response. The most effective way to prevent the development of cancer is to treat the infection in its early stages. Fortunately, vaccines for both HBV and HCV are available to both prevent and cure these diseases [53].
Those with a weakened immune system, such as those with untreated HIV, are susceptible to infection by the Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus, leading to the development of neoplasms [54]. Herpesviruses are composed of a double-stranded DNA genome surrounded by a viral capsid protein, a tegument layer, and a lipid envelope featuring eight distinct glycoproteins. These viruses cause primary infections that establish lifelong latent infections in the host with periodic reactivations. KSHV, also known as human herpesvirus-8, belongs to the family of 2-lymphotropic-oncogenic herpesviruses and is linked to primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD), and Kaposi's sarcoma. It is the newest member of the human herpesvirus family and is connected to the Rhesus monkey rhadinovirus, herpesvirus saimiri, and the Epstein-Barr virus [55].
Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS) is caused by changes in cell shape, growth rate, metabolism, gene expression and lifespan brought on by KSHV infection of endothelial cells or hematopoietic progenitors. The carcinogenic characteristics of KSHV are demonstrated by the induction of pro-angiogenic molecules such as members of the VEGF-VEGFR family and angiogenin [56].
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet approved any treatment for KSHV. KSHV-MCD has been treated with a number of cytotoxic chemotherapies, including doxorubicin, vincristine, vinblastine, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide, all of which have had clinical activity in B-cell lymphomas. Chemotherapy by itself, though, is not very successful. The reported survival with these chemotherapies, either independently or in combination, was dismal in one analysis between 1985 and 2006, with an average survival rate of 12 months [57].
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for all HIV patients, despite the fact that it is typically ineffective for treating KSHV infection. In HIV-positive individuals, ART should be given concurrently with KSHVMCD- specific therapy. With the right KSHV medication, patients with HIV-associated KSHV may experience prolonged remissions on ART. ART lowers HIV-related mortality even though its effectiveness in preventing relapses has not been established [58]. However, rituximab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 antigen on B-cells, was developed, and this led to a significant improvement in treatment responses and survival. Rituximab-based therapy have resulted in a dramatic improvement, with the majority of recent trials having a 5-year overall survival rate of more than 90%. Clinicians need to be on the lookout for KSHV relapse and the emergence of other KSHV-associated disorders as patients with KSHV-MCD continue to survive longer with proven and experimental treatment regimens [59].
Human T-lymphotropic viruses (HTLV) are a family of human retroviruses recognized for causing oncogenic and other inflammatory and immunosuppressive diseases. HTLV-1 is the most clinically significant member of the family, having been demonstrated as a pathogen capable of inducing malignant disease and widely regarded as one of the strongest human oncogenic pathogen. The first human retrovirus discovered was HTLV-1, which was also one of the first viruses found to cause cancer in humans, alongside Epstein-Barr virus [60]. HTLV-1 can be transferred through breast feeding, sexual contact infected blood transfusions and needles. Approximately 5% of infected individuals develops (Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma) ATL after a clinical latency period of several decades [25].
HTLV-1 has standard retroviral genes,
A rare form of non-T-cell Hodgkin's cancer called ATL is brought on by the HTLV-1 human retrovirus. Although though only a tiny percentage of HTLV-1 infected people acquire ATL, the clinical prognosis is poor for rapidly expanding subtypes. Recent advancements in treatment options have improved patient outcomes, but due to the heterogeneous nature of the disease, it is challenging to determine the best treatment for each individual patient. Research is required to find novel targets and create treatments to stop or halt the course of ATL [25].
In particular, RNA reverse transcription, viral polyprotein cleavage, and DNA integration are the key possible targets for antivirals. Antiretroviral may therefore only be effective against productively infected cells, or the infectious propagate, and not against non-producing infected cells. Antiretroviral are anticipated to have minimal efficacy, unless viral replication is initiated, in HTLV-1-infected patients because there is typically very little (if any) productive infection found in these patients. This could readily explain why antiretroviral are less effective in treating HTLV-1 infection than HIV infection. Consequently, considering that the possibility of treating HTLV-1 infected people with antiretroviral medication is yet debatable [62].
No vaccine exists to treat or prevent HTLV-1 infections. The notion of creating an HTLV-1 vaccine originally emerged in the early 1980s, and at first it appeared to be simpler than creating an HIV-1 vaccine. The HTLV-1 envelope gene, when expressed by a vaccinia vector, causes a partial protection against HTLV-1 infection in rodents, likely by the production of neutralizing antibodies targeted at the viral envelope, which is the basis for an effective active immunotherapy [63]. This discovery is supported by the finding that neonates of HTLV-1- infected mothers are protected against HTLV-1 infection for as long as breastfeeding permits the transfer of maternal antibodies, suggesting that neutralizing antibodies may help to prevent HTLV-1 transmission. Despite this intriguing advantage, HTLV-1 cell-to-cell transfer and the clonal proliferation of infected cells without the production of viral proteins may both work to reduce the amount of HTLV-1 envelope exposed in vivo. Finally, it is hoped that the development of novel antiretroviral or vaccine with targets unique to HTLV-1 and/or the initiation of early antiretroviral therapies may alter perceptions of diseases brought on by HTLV-1 [64].
The Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) has a genome similar to other human polyomaviruses, which is a circular, double-stranded DNA genome of 5,387 base-pairs in length. It is a member of the
The early viral gene region (EVGR) encodes for ST (small T antigen), and LT, 57kT (a spliced form of LT). An alternative open reading frame from LT contains the ALTO. The late viral gene region (LVGR) encodes VP1 and VP2 which are viral coat proteins and also encodes a microRNA regulating antigen T levels. The 72 VP1 pentamers that make up the polyomavirus virion are each coated on the inner surface by a VP2 molecule. According to the VP1 serology assay, MCPyV infection can start as early as a few months of age and become more common as people age, with 70−90% of adults showing signs of chronic infection [68].
T antigen is mainly responsible for the carcinoma. The Large T antigen (LT) of merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is a protein of 817 residues, but an alternative form, 57kT, has a central region deletion and retains only the 100 residues on C-terminal. Although its purpose is uncertain, 57kT exhibits growth-suppressing properties. Retinoblastoma tumour suppressor protein RB is bound by MCPyV LT to inactivate it and trigger cell cycle-regulated genes. This binding is caused by the LXCXE motif, which is necessary for transforming action [69]. The proliferation of MCCP tumours depends on the adsorption and inactivation of RB. MCPyV LT activates p53 through its association with RB or USP7, which is a deubiquitinase enzyme that regulates MDM2 levels and p53. LT also binds to VPS39, but the significance of this activity is not known. Due to viral genome alterations, LT is expressed in a shortened form in all MCC cancers and the truncated forms are expressed in the nucleus and cytoplasm [76]. These truncations result in the loss of the nuclear localization sequence, origin binding and helicase domains, growth-suppressing activities, and possible viral antigens that could stimulate the immune system to fight cancer leading to a rare form of highly aggressive malignancy known as Merkel cell carcinoma [26, 68].
The identification of MCPyV and its potential involvement in MCC underscores the ongoing importance of polyomavirus and DNA tumor virus research. The current resurgence of interest in these fields, along with advancements in technology, has led to the discovery of additional human viruses and thus it will continue in future [67].
Merkel cell cancer caused by MCPyV should be treated by following the same Cancer Network recommendations. Nevertheless, because the results may have an impact on follow-up, quantification of MCPyV oncoprotein antibodies may be taken into consideration during the first workup. Seronegative patients may be at increased risk for recurrence, while growing titers in seropositive patients may be an early sign of recurrence [70]. Wide local excision along with sentinel lymph node biopsy is the basis of the therapy of nonmetastatic MCC. For sentinel lymph node biopsy results, metastatic disease, or clinically positive nodes, baseline imaging is advised. For nodal disease that has been clinically identified as well as pathology-proven, lymphadenectomy or nodal radiotherapy is needed. When no nodal illness has been verified, nodal radiotherapy may be explored for high-risk patients [71].
Extensive local excision may not always be necessary, and a recent evaluation found that in cases of earlystage MCC without nodal disease, Mohs micrographic surgery had long-term survival and increased cancer clearing rates. Another recent analysis found that local and regional radiation monotherapy would be a viable option for treating stage I, II, or III illness that is incurable. The US Food and Drug Administration only granted approval Avelumab, a completely human anti- PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, as a treatment for MCC. In a phase II clinical trial, Avelumab showed a therapeutic response in 33% of patients, with a median general survival of 11 months. Anti-PD-L1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab are also being investigated for treatment in metastatic MCC [72].
The very first virus connected to human cancer was the Epstein-Barr virus, following its detection in the tumor cells of pediatric Burkitt lymphoma patients [7]. The Herpes family double-stranded DNA virus Epstein- Barr virus (EBV) has been linked to a number of malignancies is associated with various cancers, including gastric carcinoma (GC), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and Burkitt's lymphoma (BL). Although extensive research has been conducted, the etiology of EBV-related cancers is not fully comprehended. It is probable that other factors, such as genetic mutations, environmental circumstances, and underlying diseases, considering that only a small portion of people with EBV infection go on to develop cancer [13, 27].
EBV has been categorized as a group 1 carcinogen, which is a category only for compounds that are known to cause cancer in people [16]. One of the hallmarks of EBV infection is its potential to immortalize normal B cells
EBV can mediate infection via two mechanisms: latent infection and lytic infection. When a virus is latently infected, it does not manifest any symptoms. However occasionally, the virus can enter a lytic state, in which it releases fresh viral particles and induces the growth of cancerous tumors from cells [77]. The molecular events involved in this process, such as the expression of viral proteins that prevent apoptosis, promote genomic instability, and cause unchecked proliferation and migration of cells are well understood and are known to signal the beginning of a tumor followed by persistent tumor maintenance, although the true etiology is not fully understood yet but the involvement of human leukocyte antigens (HLA] [27]. In addition to its ability to induce oncogenesis, EBV also employs a variety of mechanisms to evade the host immune response, which allows the virus to persist and continue to cause cancer. For instance, the virus only expresses a tiny subset of its genes during the initial lytic infection, helping to thwart the host's immune system from recognizing it [78]. EBV can imitate the properties of IL-10, a cytokine that aids in the suppression of the immune response, and it controls the production of several cytokines that are important for the host immune response, including as TNF-, IL-1, and IL-6 [79]. Finally, it is worth noting that the malignant pathogenesis of EBV is enhanced by a number of factors, includes a chronically inflamed host microenvironment and a weakened host immune system brought on by specific medical disorders. These elements may encourage the development of cancer by encouraging the proliferation and spread of EBV-infected cells [80].
Viral latency proteins are expressed in EBV-associated cancers and are used in therapeutic EBV vaccines that were created to treat people who have EBV lymphomas or nasopharyngeal carcinoma. These vaccines contain replication-defective vectors, such as recombinant vaccinia Ankara that expresses LMP2 and EBNA1 fragments, dendritic cells from people infected with modified adenovirus that encodes LMP2 [73]. EBV vaccines, however, have the potential to cause a “unusual” or “excessive” immune response against EBV, which could result in the onset or aggravation of autoimmune illnesses like Multiple Sclerosis (MS). In contrast, a transitory sterilizing immunity induced by an EBV vaccination can theoretically postpone the start of a primary infection and cause MS to become more severe later in life [74].
EBV has been linked to MS through a process known as molecular mimicry wherein antibodies or T cells to EBV proteins interact with CNS proteins. If this theory is accurate, immunization with certain EBV protein fragments, such as EBNA1, that interact with CNS proteins can trigger an immune response that raises the risk of MS. Consequently, it is important to carefully assess which viral antigens would be contained in EBV vaccinations [75].
The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted infection that is common throughout the world and is strongly associated with cervical cancer. Most individuals who engage in multiple sexual activities will contract HPV at some point in their lives [17]. The
Most HPV infections are quickly eliminated by the immune system, and viral DNA incorporation into the host cell is rare. Although rapid tumor cell transformation caused by viral DNA incorporation is possible, cancer cannot be caused by viral DNA incorporation alone without other genetic and epigenetic changes. The E6 and E7 oncoproteins are the main drivers of HPVassociated cancer, as they modify the cell cycle and apoptosis, and their dysregulated expression is caused by disruption of the E2 protein's transcriptional repression [82]. The E5 oncogene, which affects immunological functions like antigen presentation and inflammation, is expressed by HPV and can lead to immune evasion. The immune response is a crucial defense against HPV infection and cervical carcinogenesis [83].
The HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 play a significant role in neoplastic transformation by altering the cell cycle, regulating apoptosis, and disrupting key tumor suppressor proteins [84]. E7 inactivates pRb, leading to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, while E6 promotes the proteosomal degradation of the tumor suppressor p53 through its interaction with E6AP [82, 85]. The HPV-induced degradation of p53 is a crucial aspect of neoplastic transformation, and its concentration is often lower in HPV-infected cells than in healthy cells. E6AP is an E3 ubiquitin protein ligase that regulates the binding of E6 to p53. E6AP turnover is increased in the presence of E6, which enhances its enzymatic activity in the cellular environment [82].
The vaccines are ineffective if an individual already has an HPV infection or cervical lesions caused by HPV. HPV vaccines such as Gardasil and Cervarix prevent infection by stimulating the production of neutralizing antibodies against specific types of HPV. They are primarily used to prevent cervical cancer and are most effective when administered before exposure to the virus. The recommended age for vaccination is between 11−12 years old, with the possibility of receiving the vaccine up to age 26. The vaccines are given in three shots over a six-month period [28].
Investigations are being done on therapeutic vaccinations and preventative vaccines based on L2. L2-based vaccines have the potential to provide protection against a wide variety of HPV strains since L2 sequences are substantially conserved across HPV types. Additionally, numerous immunotherapies and specific therapies for HPV-related cancers are being researched, and several have US Food and Drug Administration approval [72].
This review aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of viral oncogenesis, contributing to a broader understanding of oncoviruses and their pathogenesis. The oncogenic virus infections cause up to 20% of human cancers presents an opportunity for further research to address knowledge gaps. Removing the causative agent not only controls the infectious disease but also prevents associated cancers. The presence of viruses in the body and underlying diseases are major causes of cancer. Vaccination programs, such as for HBV and HPV, have demonstrated that cancer prevention can limit the oncogenic effects of viruses, but currently there are limited oncovirus vaccines available. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided us with opportunities to use advanced research facilities to develop not only vaccines but also detection markers for cancer prevention. The majority of microbe-related markers can help with secondary and tertiary prevention of malignancies linked to infections. To find new cancers and vaccines linked to infections, however, further study is necessary. The majority of the current understanding regarding the connection between microorganisms and cancer is concentrated in Western nations. This article advocates for the need to expand our understanding of these mechanisms and develop effective prevention strategies in developing countries to protect their populations from these infections.
This review digs into the complex realm of oncogenic viruses and pathogenesis, revealing fresh insight on their captivating modes of action and key role in cancer formation. However, investigating viral-induced tumors might potentially help answer crucial questions in cancer biology. These could include determining cancer's evolutionary bottlenecks, locating the most vulnerable regions in the regulation of genes networks for virus induced cancer, and establishing methods to reduce genetic and environmental variables that contribute to oncogenesis. Researchers may also investigate techniques to reverse tissue microenvironment factors that favor cancer cell evolution. Ultimately, getting a full grasp of the factors behind viral infections and cancer growth might provide a better ordered scientific structure for study and open up new treatment approaches.
We would like to acknowledge Instamed Medical Equipment Trading LLC, UAE for their valuable support and contribution to this article.
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Yong Hwan Choi, Ha Seung Song, Su Keun Lee, Chi Hun Song, Ji Hoe Kim, and Kyung Ho Han
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(3): 223-242 https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2307.07014Jae-Sik Jeon , Jong Wan Kim and Jae Kyung Kim
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018; 46(2): 171-179 https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1803.03006