Contact us
닫기
Article Search
닫기

Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters

보문(Article)

View PDF

Molecular and Cell biology, and Microbial Isolation

Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014; 42(3): 211-218

https://doi.org/10.4014/kjmb.1406.06001

Received: June 9, 2014; Accepted: August 6, 2014

장내 유해세균을 억제하는 양돈용 프로바이오틱스 개발을 위한 비피도박테리아 탐색

Screening of Bifidobacteria for the Development of Probiotics Inhibiting Intestinal Pathogenic Bacteria

Jaeyeon Lee 1, Yungoh Shin 1 and Keun Kim 1*

Institute of Bioindustry, The University of Suwon, Hwaseong 445-743, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Go to

In order to isolate probiotic lactic acid bacteria possessing high inhibitory activities against porcine and zoonotic pathogens, such as enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Clostridium perfringens, a total of 65 anaerobic strains were initially isolated from a variety of sources including cattle rumen fluids, chicken intestines and swine feces. Four Bifidobacterium strains were selected for their high anti-pathogenic bacterial activities. By using the 16S rDNA sequencing method, three B. boum strains and one B. thermophilum were identified. B. thermophilum demonstrated the best adhesive ability to epithelial cells of swine intestine among the isolates. Indeed, B. thermophilum was seen to have superior characteristics as a probiotic for swine, as judged by their high growth inhibitory activities against various pathogens, and high acid- and bile-tolerance.

Keywords: Lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, swine, intestinal pathogenic bacteria

References

Go to
  1. Adams MR, Nicholaides L. 1997. Reviews of the sensitivity of different foodborne pathogens to fermentation. Food Control. 8: 227-239.
    CrossRef
  2. Alexander TJL. 1994. Neonatal diarrhea in pigs, pp. 151-170. In Gyles CL (ed.), Escherichia coli in Domestic Animals and Humans, CAB international, Wallingford. U.K.
    Pubmed
  3. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Bäckström, L. 1973. Environment and health in piglet production. A field study of incidences and litter number on behaviour and physiological responses related to welfare status of individual and group housed pigs. Appl. Anim. Behaviour Sci. 17:229-243.
  5. Bertschinger HU, Fairbrother JM. 1999. Escherchia coli infections, Sec. 3, Bacterial diseases, pp. 431-468. In Taylor DJ (ed.), Diseases of swine, 8th Ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
  6. Beutin L, Geiser D, Steinruck H, Zimmermann S, Scheutz F. 1998. Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (shiga-like toxin)-producing E. coli in seven different species of healthy domestic animals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31: 2483-2488.
  7. Björk AKK, Christensson E, Olsson NG, Martinsson KB. 1984. The clinical effect of amperozide in pig production. I. Effect of amperozide on aggression and performance in weaners. XV. p. 335. Proc. Int. Vet. Soc. 8th Congress, Ghent. Belgium, 2731 August, 1984.
  8. Carghill CF 1982. Control of E. coli infections in pigs. Austral. Adv. Vet. Sci. pp. 206-207.
  9. Chang YH, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Kim WY, Kim YB, Park YH. 2001. Selection of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus strain and subsequent in vivo studies. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 80: 193199.
    CrossRef
  10. Chou LS, Weimer B. 1999. Isolation and characterization of acid- and bile-tolerant isolates from strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 23-31.
    CrossRef
  11. Coconnier M, Lievin HV, Lorrot M, Servin AL. 2000. Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB against intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infecting human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC-7 cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 1152-1157.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. De Angelis M, Siragusa S, Berioco M, Caputo L, Settanni L, Alfonsi G. 2006. Selection of potential probiotic lactobacilli from pig feces to be used as additives in pelleted feeding. Res. Microbiol. 157: 792-801.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Dicks LM, Botes M. 2010. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria in the gastro-intestinal tract: health benefits, safety, and mode of action. Benef. Microbes 1: 11-19.
  14. Dunne C. 2011. Adaptation of bacteria to the intestinal niche:Probiotics and gut disorder. Inflam. Bowel Dis. 7: 136-145.
    CrossRef
  15. Fahy VA, Connaughton D, Driesen SJ, Spicer EM. 1987. Post-weaning colibacillosis, pp. 189-201. In APSA Committee (eds.), Manipulating Pig Production, Australian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
  16. FAO/WHO. 2001. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food, including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consulation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food, including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. FAO, Cordoba, Argentina.
  17. Fontana L, Bermudez-Brito M, Plaza-Diaz J, Munoz-Quezada S, Gil A. 2013. Sources, isolation, characterization and evaluation of probiotics. British J. Nutrition. 109: S35-S50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Fuller R, Gibson GR. 1997. Modification of the intestinal microflora using probiotics and prebiotics. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 222: 28-31.
  19. Gueimonde M, Salminen S. 2006. New methods for selecting and evaluating probiotics. Dig. Liver Dis. 38: S242-247.
    CrossRef
  20. Hartemink, R, Kok BJ, Weenk GH, Rombouts FM. 1996. Raffinose-Bifidobacterium (RB) agar, a new selective medium for bifidobacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods. 27: 33-43.
    CrossRef
  21. Havenaar R, Brink BT, Veid JHJI. 1992. Selection of strains for probiotic use, pp. 209-224. In Fuller R (ed.), Probiotics :The scientific basis. Chapmann & Hall, London.
    CrossRef
  22. Hudault, S, Lievin V, Bernet-Camard MF, Servin AL. 1997. Antagonistic activity exerted in vitro and in vivo by Lactobacillus casei (strain GG) against Salmonella Typhimurium C5 infection. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 513-518.
    Pubmed
  23. Jonsson E, Conway P. 1992. Probiotic for pigs, pp. 209-224. In Fuller R. (ed.), Probiotics : The scientific basis. Chapmann & Hall, London.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Lahteinen, T, Malinen E, Koort JMK, Mertaniemi-Hannus U, Hankimo T, Karikoski N, et al. 2010. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus isolates originating from porcine intestine and feces. Anaerobe. 16: 293-300.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Lee DY, Seo YS, Rayamajhi N, Kang ML, Lee SI, Yoo HS. 2009. Isolation, characterization, an evaluation of wild isolates of Lactobacillus reuteri from pig feces. J. Microbiol. 47: 663672.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Lee JY, Hwang KY, Kim HS, Kim K. 2002. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria inhibiting gastro-intestinal pathogenic bacteria of domestic animal. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30: 129-134.
  27. Lee JY, Hwang KY, Kim K, Park YS, Paik MJ, Kim KR. 2002. Characteristics of antimicrobial organic acids produced by Lactobacillus pentosus K34 isolated from small intestines of Korean native chickens. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30:241-246.
  28. Minocha, A. 2009. Probiotics for preventive health. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 24: 227-241.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Nissen L, Chingwaru W, Sgorbati B, Biavati B, Cencic A. 2009. Gut health promoting activity of new putative probiotic/protective Lactobacillus spp.strains: A functional study in the small intestinal cell model. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 135: 288294.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Nousianen J, Javanainen P, Setala J, von Wright A. 2004. Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics, pp. 547-580. In Salminen S, von Wright A, Quwehand A. (eds.) Lactic acid bacteria. Microbiological and functional aspects. 3rd Ed. Marcel Dekker. New York.
  31. Petinaki E, Spiliopoulou I. 2012. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among companion and food-chain animals:impact of human contacts. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18: 626-634.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Pletinckx LJ, Verhegghe M, Crombé F, Dewulf J, De Bleecker Y, Rasschaert G, et al. 2013. Evidence of possible methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 spread between pigs and other animals and people residing on the same farm. Prev. Vet. Med. 109: 293-303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Rodriguez E, Arques JL, Rodriguez R, Nunez M, Medina M. 2003. Reuterin production by lactobacilli isolated from pig faeces and evaluation of probiotic traits. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37:259-263.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Sanders ME, Kondo JK, Willrett DL. 1991. Application of lactic acid bacteria, pp. 433-459. In Goldberg I. Williams R (eds.), Biotechnology and Food Ingredient, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  35. Schillinger U, Lücke F. 1989. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:1901-1906.
    Pubmed
  36. Schwartz KJ. 1999. Salmonellosis, Sec. 3, Bacterial diseases, pp.535-551. In Taylor DJ (ed.), Diseases of swine, 8th Ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
    Pubmed
  37. Smith HW. 1965. The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 90: 495-513.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Taylor DJ. 1999. Clostridial infections, Sec. 3, Bacterial diseases, pp. 395-412. In Taylor DJ (ed.), Diseases of swine, 8th Ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
    Pubmed
  39. Wang JQ, Yin FG, Zhu C, Yu H, Niven SJ, deLange CFM, et al. 2012. Evaluation of probiotic bacteria for their effects on the growth performance and intestinal microbiota of newlyweaned pigs fed fermented high-moisture maize. Livestock Sci. 145: 79-86.
    CrossRef

Article Tools

Starts of Metrics

Share this article on :

Related articles in MBL

Most Searched Keywords ?

What is Most Searched Keywords?

  • It is most registrated keyword in articles at this journal during for 2 years.