Food Microbiology | Probiotics in Nutrition and Health
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(4): 403-415
https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2308.08008
Jenjuiree Mahittikon1, Sitanan Thitiprasert2, Nuttha Thongchul2, Naoto Tanaka3, Yuh Shiwa3,4, Nitcha Chamroensaksri5, and Somboon Tanasupawat1*
1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2Center of Excellence in Bioconversion and Bioseparation for Platform Chemical Production, Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3Department of Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan
4NODAI Genome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan
5National Biobank of Thailand (NBT), National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
Correspondence to :
Somboon Tanasupawat, Somboon.T@Chula.ac.th
This study aimed to isolate and identify L-(+)-lactic acid-producing bacteria from tree barks collected in Thailand and evaluate the potential strain as probiotics. Twelve strains were isolated and characterized phenotypically and genotypically. The strains exhibited a rod-shaped morphology, high-temperature tolerance, and the ability to ferment different sugars into lactic acid. Based on 16S rRNA gene analysis, all strains were identified as belonging to Weizmannia coagulans. Among the isolated strains, BKMTCR2-2 demonstrated exceptional lactic acid production, with 96.41% optical purity, 2.33 g/l of lactic acid production, 1.44 g/g of lactic acid yield (per gram of glucose consumption), and 0.0049 g/l/h of lactic acid productivity. This strain also displayed a wide range of pH tolerance, suggesting suitability for the human gastrointestinal tract and potential probiotic applications. The whole-genome sequence of BKMTCR2-2 was assembled using a hybridization approach that combined long and short reads. The genomic analysis confirmed its identification as W. coagulans and safety assessments revealed its non-pathogenic attribute compared to type strains and commercial probiotic strains. Furthermore, this strain exhibited resilience to acidic and bile conditions, along with the presence of potential probiotic-related genes and metabolic capabilities. These findings suggest that BKMTCR2-2 holds promise as a safe and effective probiotic strain with significant lactic acid production capabilities.
Keywords: Genomic analysis, lactic acid bacteria, L-(+)-lactic acid, tree bark, probiogenomic, Weizmannia coagulans
Numerous studies support the safe utilization of probiotic strains belonging to
To establish their efficacy as probiotics, it is crucial for strains commonly found in food and health supplements to withstand the challenges posed by the gastrointestinal tract, including acidic gastric acid, bile, and pancreatin.
This study aimed to characterize
Tree bark was collected from Bangkok, Chaiyaphum, Nakhon Ratchasima, and Satun provinces in Thailand. Each sample was pre-treated with heat at 80℃ for 10 min. The samples were enriched in Glucose-Yeast-Peptone (GYP) medium, which consisted of 10 g of glucose, 5 g of yeast extract, 5 g of peptone, 0.25 g of KH2PO4, 0.25 g of K2HPO4, and 10 ml of salt solution. The salt solution consisted of (per 1 L) 0.4 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.02 g of MnSO4·5H2O, 0.02 g of FeSO4·7H2O, and 0.02 g of NaCl. The samples were incubated anaerobically at 37℃ for 48−72 h. After incubation, the isolates were streaked on GYP agar supplemented with 0.3% CaCO3 and incubated at 37℃ for three days under anaerobic conditions using AnaeroPack (Kenki), Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Japan. Colonies surrounded by a clear zone were selected and purified until a pure culture was obtained. All strains were preserved in skim milk stock at -20℃ and stored in lyophilized ampoules [6].
For phenotypic characteristics, cell shape, cell size, colonial appearance, Gram-staining, and spore formation of cells grown on GYP agar supplemented with CaCO3, incubation at 37℃ for 48 h under anaerobic conditions were observed, as described previously [7]. The biochemical and physiological characteristics, such as gas formation, catalase production, nitrate reduction, arginine hydrolysis, blood hemolysis and the effects of growth at different temperatures (15, 30, 37, 45℃), pH values (3.0, 6.0, 9.0), and NaCl concentrations (4, 6, 8% w/v), were examined. The isomer of lactic acid was enzymatically determined, as described by Tanasupawat
The 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The DNA of each strain was extracted using the colony PCR method. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing was conducted with the primers 27F (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and 1492R (5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3') by Macrogen [9]. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were then analyzed using the Ezbiocloud web-based tools [10]. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 11 [11], and confidence values for the individual branches of the phylogenetic tree were determined through 1000 replicates [12].
Genome sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq and Oxford Nanopore platforms at the Nodai Genome Research Centre, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Japan. The genomic DNA of strain BKMTCR2-2 was extracted using a NucleoBond Buffer Set III (TaKaRa, Japan) and a NucleoBond AXG20 column (TaKaRa). The short-read DNA was prepared and sequenced following the Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep Kit protocol (Illumina, USA) and the Illumina HiSeq 2000, respectively, as described in the method by Yokoyama
The 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences of BKMTCR2-2 are available at the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under accession numbers LC769116 and JASUZX000000000, respectively. The accession numbers for
The whole-genome sequence of representative isolate BKMTCR2-2 was assembled by hybridizing reads from the short-read Illumina and the long-read Oxford Nanopore Technologies instruments [16]. The raw genome sequences were trimmed and assembled using the Unicycler (version Galaxy Version 0.5.0+galaxy1) [17, 18]. The genomic circular was generated by Proksee [19].
The gene annotation and prediction, feature analysis, and plasmid observation were carried out using DDBJ Fast Annotation and Submission Tool (DFAST) server [20], Rapid Annotation Server Technology (RAST) [21], PATRIC [22], the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [23], PlasmidFinder [24], BAGLE4 [25]. The dbCAN server was used to annotate and analyze carbohydrate-active enzyme genes (https://bcb.unl.edu/dbCAN2/blast.php) with HMMER (version: 3.3.2). The CAZy database (http://www.cazy.org/) was used to classified and generated enzyme family [26, 27]. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database determined the bacterial enzymatic and genetic metabolic pathways [28]. The potential associated genes of probiotic characteristics were evaluated [18].
For the utilization of BKMTCR2-2 as a probiotic, a safety assessment was conducted based on several criteria. In this study, three probiotic reference strains,
The Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) was used to evaluate the pathogenicity [29], antibiotic resistance gene [30], acquired virulence genes [31], and plasmids [32]. The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database, CARD, detected antibiotic resistance genes [33]. Additionally, the origin of transfer in DNA sequence was investigated by oriTfinder, a web-based tool [34].
The lactic acid isomer was screened using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). LAB was cultivated in GYP broth at 37℃ for 48 h, and the supernatant was collected by centrifugation. The concentration, optical purity, and other by-products were evaluated using HPLC [6].
The product yield (Yp/s), productivity, and optical purity were calculated following the methods described by Thitiprasert
All experiments were done in triplicate, and results were reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (Analysis of variance) with Duncan's new multiple range test for mean comparison by SPSS 22.0 software.
All isolates were cultivated and incubated in GYP broth at 30℃ for 48 h. The supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. The cell-free supernatants (CFSs) were neutralized to pH 6.0 using 1 M NaOH and then boiled at 100℃ for 5 min. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated using the spot-on-lawn assay [36]. In this study, the indicator strains used were
Twelve strains were isolated from various tree barks, namely
Table 1 . Samples, collecting places, strain number, and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (%) of strains compared with
NO. | Tree bark (Scientific name) | Province | Strain no. | Similarity (%) | Length (bp) | Accession no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bangkok | BKMCBM-1 | 99.78 | 1,371 | LC769107 | |
2 | Bangkok | BKAP-4 | 99.72 | 1,410 | LC769108 | |
BKMCCL-1 | 99.57 | 1,403 | LC769109 | |||
BKMCCL-2 | 99.56 | 1,379 | LC769110 | |||
3 | Bangkok | BKMTCR2-2 | 99.12 | 1,554 | LC769116 | |
4 | Bangkok | BKMPT-8 | 99.22 | 1,404 | LC769117 | |
5 | Chaiyaphum | CPDR-3 | 99.22 | 1,430 | LC769111 | |
8 | Nakhon Ratchasima | NKSA-1 | 99.56 | 1,371 | LC769113 | |
NKSA-4 | 99.36 | 1,405 | LC769114 | |||
NKSA-5 | 99.63 | 1,358 | LC769115 | |||
9 | Satun | STAI-4 | 98.96 | 1,450 | LC769106 | |
10 | Satun | STM-11 | 99.63 | 1,360 | LC769112 |
Table 2 . Differential phenotypic characteristics of strains.
Characteristics | BKMCBM-1 | BKAP-4 | BKMCCL-1 | BKMCCL-2 | BKMTCR2-2 | BKPT-8 | CPDR-3 | NKSA-1 | NKSA-4 | NKSA-5 | STAI-4 | STM-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Growth at 15℃ | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
Growth in pH 3.0 | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | - | + | - | - |
Growth in pH 9.0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + |
Esculin hydrolysis | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | - | - |
Arginine hydrolysis | - | + | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | - |
Nitrate reduction | - | + | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Acid production from: | ||||||||||||
Cellobiose | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | + | - | + | + |
Mannitol | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | - | + | - | - |
Raffinose | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | + |
Rhamnose | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
Salicin | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | - | + | + |
Xylose | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
+, positive reaction; -, negative reaction. All strains and
The various phenotypic characteristics of the isolating strains are presented in Table 2. All strains exhibited a rod-shaped morphology and did not produce gas from glucose. They could grow in a medium containing 4% NaCl at pH 6.0 and temperatures of 30℃ and 45℃, but they failed to grow in the presence of 8% NaCl. Additionally, the strains showed positive results for catalase activity. In terms of sugar utilization and acid production, they could synthesize acid from arabinose, fructose, galactose, glucose, lactose, maltose, mannose, melibiose, ribose, sucrose, and trehalose. However, they were unable to hemolyse blood and produce acid from sorbitol.
In terms of genomic characteristics, all strains exhibited a 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity ranging from 98.96% to 99.78% with
Fermentation kinetics, including lactic acid concentration, the yield of lactic acid, and the productivity of the isolated strain by HPLC, are presented in Fig. 2. All strains exhibited characteristics of homofermentative lactic acid production without producing acetic acid and ethanol as by-products. Under anaerobic conditions for 48 h, with an initial glucose concentration of 10 g, they produced L-(+)-lactic acid with an optical purity ranging from 84.57% to 100%. They yielded 0.34 g/l to 2.33 g/l of lactic acid production, 0.29 g/g to 1.44 g/g of lactic acid yield (per gram of sugar consumed), and had a lactic acid production rate of 0.007 g/l/h to 0.0049 g/l/h. The strain BKMTCR2-2 presented significant differences from other strains (
The screening of antimicrobial activity by using spoton-lawn assay, which selected
Based on the results, strain BKMTCR2-2 exhibited several attractive characteristics, including growth at pH 3.0 and 9.0 under anaerobic conditions, which are assumed to represent gastric and intestinal conditions. This strain showed no hemolysis activity compared to
Table 3 . Genomic features of
Attribute | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Source | Tree bark ( | Dairy (Evaporated milk) | Human fecal contaminated soil | Marketed probiotic product |
Accession no. | PRJNA975477A | NZ_CP009709A | JZDH00000000A | JPSK01000000A |
Genome size (bp) | 3,270,341G | 3,366,995B | 3,446,692B | 3,458,616B |
Plasmids | 0C | 0C | 0C | 0C |
Genome qualities: | ||||
- Genome quality | GoodD | GoodD | GoodD | GoodD |
- Completeness (%) | 96E | 95.9E | 99.6E | 99.6E |
- Coarse consistency | 96.5D | 96.5D | 96.2D | 96.2D |
- Fine consistency | 95.2D | 95.9D | 95.1D | 94.8D |
G+C content (%) | 47.1B | 46.9B | 46.4B | 46.4B |
Genome coverage | 103x | 776x | 282.0x | 840.0x |
N50 | 2,013,348B | 1B | 51,676B | 44,706B |
L50 | 1B | 1B | 20B | 27B |
No. of contig | 14B | 1B | 143B | 224B |
No. of subsystem | 294B | 297B | 298B | 297B |
No. of coding sequences | 3,740B | 3888B | 3,994B | 4,061B |
No. of RNA | 103B | 107B | 87B | 88B |
No. of CRISPRS | 2F | 3F | 2F | 5F |
A, Information obtained from NCBI; B, Information obtained from RAST web-based tool; C, Information obtained from PlasmidFinder; D, Information obtained from PATRIC; E, Information obtained from CheckM; F, Information obtained from DFAST annotation; G, Information obtained from Unicycle, Galaxy.
Based on DFAST and RAST annotation, the gastrointestinal survival association and beneficially healthy gastric gene as probiotic properties are illustrated in Table 5. The CGE website predicted the safety evaluation of strain BKMTCR2-2 for elevated verification for probiotic consumption. As for the safety estimation results, this strain was defined as a non-human pathogenic bacterium with no virulence, plasmid, and antibiotic resistance genes. Additional resistance gene identification was analyzed by CARD (Table 4). Furthermore, carbohydrate-active enzyme genes are annotated and shown in Supplementary 1.
Table 4 . Pathogenicity prediction, prophage detection, and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) analysis from PathogenFinder of CGE (Default program settings applied) of strain BKMTCR2-2 and related
Attribute/Strain | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Probability of being a human pathogen | 0.466 | 0.456 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Input proteome coverage (%) | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
Matched pathogenic families | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Matched not pathogenic families | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Conclusion | Non-human pathogen | Non-human pathogen | Non-human pathogen | Non-human pathogen |
Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) | ||||
CARD: | ||||
- No. of perfect hits | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- No. of strict hits | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
- No. of loose hits | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210 |
ResFinder | No resistance | No resistance | No resistance | No resistance |
Table 5 . Potential genes associated to various probiotic characteristics from
Putative function | Genes | Gene product |
---|---|---|
Acid resistance | ||
F0F1 ATP synthase subunit A | ||
- | ATP synthase subunit B | |
F0F1 ATP synthase subunit C | ||
F0F1 ATP synthase subunit alpha | ||
F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta | ||
- | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit delta | |
F0F1 ATP synthase subunit epsilon | ||
F0F1 ATP synthase subunit gamma | ||
Chaperonin GroEL | ||
Co-chaperone GroES | ||
Recombinase RecA | ||
Aspartate-tRNA ligase | ||
- | GTP pyrophosphokinase family protein | |
Acid and Bile resistance | ||
Molecular chaperone DnaK | ||
Molecular chaperone DnaJ | ||
Bifunctional UDP-N-acetylglucosamine diphosphorylase/glucosamine-1-phosphate N-acetyltransferase GlmU | ||
- | S-ribosylhomocysteine lyase | |
2,3-Bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase | ||
Bile resistance | ||
50S Ribosomal protein L4 | ||
50S Ribosomal protein L5 | ||
50S Ribosomal protein L6 | ||
30S Ribosomal protein S3 | ||
30S Ribosomal protein S5 | ||
CTP synthase | ||
Arginine-tRNA ligase | ||
Glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase | ||
Glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase | ||
Gastrointestinal adherence | ||
Chaperonin GroEL | ||
Co-chaperone GroES | ||
Type I glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | ||
Lipoprotein signal peptidase II | ||
Glutamine ABC transporter substrate-binding protein | ||
Elongation factor Tu | ||
- | Glucose-6-isomerase | |
Maintenance of organism system | ||
Catabolite control protein A | ||
DNA and protein protection and repair | ||
Peptide-methionine (S)-S-oxide reductase MsrA | ||
Peptide-methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase MsrB | ||
Chaperonin GroEL | ||
Co-chaperone GroES | ||
Regulation of immune system / Acid resistance | ||
Potential immunogenic proteins | ||
Elongation factor Tu | ||
Lipoprotein signal peptidase | ||
Metabolic rearrangement | ||
Alpha-Acetolactate decarboxylase | ||
Transcriptional regulator | ||
Heat-inducible transcriptional repressor HrcA | ||
Transcriptional regulator CtsR | ||
Fatty acid synthesis | ||
Acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxylase subunit | ||
ACP S-malonyltransferase | ||
Beta-Ketoacyl-ACP synthase II | ||
Beta-Ketoacyl-ACP synthase III | ||
Enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase FabL | ||
Vitamin synthesis (Subsystem) | ||
Thiamin biosynthesis (Thiamin: B1) | ||
Riboflavin metabolism (Riboflavin: B2) | ||
NAD and NADP cofactor biosynthesis global (Niacin: B3) | ||
Coenzyme A biosynthesis (Pantothenate: B5) | ||
Biotin biosynthesis (Biotin: B7) | ||
Folate biosynthesis (Folate: B9) |
The outstanding feature of this research consisted of bacterial characterization, screening, and identification of
The bacterial proposal focused on the potential of strain BKMTCR2-2 as a lactic acid fermentation and probiotic strain, aiming to overcome various limitations in lactic acid production, gastrointestinal survival, and industrial probiotic production, such as high-temperature stress, acidic environments, rapid dehydration, and associated oxidative damage. Additionally, it has been observed that strains isolated from plants exhibit more resilience to environmental stressors when compared to strains isolated from animals [2]. Therefore, the first isolation approach involved an 80℃ pretreatment of tree bark in gathering high-stress tolerant bacterial strains. All isolated strains underwent conventional characterization for bacterial identification and attribute evaluation, including phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. They were Gram-positive, rod-shaped, catalase-negative, high-temperature-tolerating, facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and the phylogenetic tree, two branches were identified, one forming a group with
The whole-genome sequencing of the strain was utilized for bacterial identification, safety assessment, and prediction of probiotic-related genes. To improve the precision and quality of the bacterial genome, both longread and short-read DNA of BKMTCR2-2 were combined using whole-genome assembly methods [38]. Strain BKMTCR2-2 was classified as
Regarding safety evaluation, strain BKMTCR2-2 was identified as a non-human pathogen. The absence of hemolysis activity compared to
Additionally, the
This study isolated twelve strains from various tree barks and characterized them. These strains exhibited characteristics of lactic acid production without producing harmful by-products. BKMTCR2-2 showed outstanding phenotypic traits, including wide-range pH growth abilities and high production, yield, and productivity of L-(+)-lactic acid. The taxonomic classification of BKMTCR2-2 was determined to be
The results of this study demonstrate the potential of strain BKMTCR2-2 as a safe and effective probiotic in improving the human host's nutritional status and metabolic functions. Acknowledging that these findings are based on the present data and current understanding is essential. Further research and comprehensive safety assessments, including in vitro and in vivo studies, would be beneficial to confirm the probiotic safety profile. Investigating the characteristics and probiotic capabilities of
This research was supported by the Development and Promotion of Science and Technology Talents Project (DPST), Thai government scholarship as a scholarship to Jenjuiree M. (561060), the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund), Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University for providing research fund (Grant number Phar2565-RG002) to Dr. Somboon Tanasupawat. The genomic analysis was associated by the Department of Molecular Microbiology, Tokyo University of Agriculture. The authors thank the Pharmaceutical Research Instrument Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University for providing research facilities; Dr. Engkarat Kingkaew; Dr. Sukanya Phuengjayaem, Dr. Saranporn Poothong and all friends for consistency encouragement to pass through the research project.
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Dong-Jin Kim, Ju Sung Lee, Seungwoo Kim, Sang Kyun Park, Yeo-Sang Yoon, Yougku Ryu, and Myung Jun Chung
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2024; 52(3): 275-287 https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2407.07008Hyun Ju Kim, Min Sung Kwon, Hyelyeon Hwang, Ha-Sun Choi, WooJe Lee, Sang-Pil Choi, Haeun Jo, and Sung Wook Hong
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(4): 353-373 https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2310.10011Bertrand Tatsinkou Fossi, Dickson Ebwelle Ekabe, Liliane Laure Toukam Tatsinkou, Rene Bilingwe Ayiseh, Frederic Tavea, and Pierre Michel Jazet
Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023; 51(2): 191-202 https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2210.10002